Reflective satellites are getting in the way of stargazing.
(Joshua Rozells)
There are currently over 14,000 of them in orbit, a number that's rising quickly. That's a real issue for astronomers.
So-called satellite-induced light pollution is already interfering with a significant number of images captured by observatories on Earth, and with thousands more low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites planned, the problem is only going to get worse.
"The night sky is one of humanity's oldest windows into the Universe," says astrophysicist Astha Chaturvedi from the University of Surrey.
"But it is becoming increasingly difficult to see things."
Chaturvedi and a team of researchers in the UK think they might have the answer: Vantablack 310, a specific formulation of one of the blackest materials ever developed, intended for use on spacecraft.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJNwAKSL17s
In lab tests, coating satellites with Vantablack 310 meant that only 2 percent of incoming light was reflected.
"Our results show that relatively simple material choices could make a meaningful difference to how satellites affect astronomical observations without requiring major changes to mission design," says Chaturvedi.
The researchers used physics models to test the black coating's performance at different points in orbit – a shiny satellite is more reflective over snow than over the open ocean, for example.
At its most reflective, the Vantablack 310 satellite scored between 6.7 and 7.0 on the AB magnitude scale (lower values indicate brighter).
(Surrey NanoSystems)
Many simulated orbits produced results comfortably above this, with values reaching 7.1 to 7.8.
That worst-case figure of 6.7 is just below the magnitude-7 threshold for satellite and orbiting-object brightness recommended by the International Astronomical Union.
It's also much better than the magnitude 3.7 scored by an uncoated SpaceX satellite tested by the researchers.
It's worth mentioning that SpaceX has also tested methods to reduce satellite brightness under the names DarkSat and VisorSat. Vantablack 310 proved comparable to or better than these as well.
"Under identical geometric and areal assumptions, the coated surface yields peak brightness values that are fainter than those reported for uncoated Starlink chassis, and comparable to or fainter than DarkSat and VisorSat variants," write the researchers in their published paper.
In addition, the team used an electron microscope to see how the ultra-black coating affected the treated satellite.
They found it created "coral-like features with cavity-like depressions", evidence of the physical properties that are doing the light trapping.
Many simulated orbits produced results comfortably above this, with values reaching 7.1 to 7.8.
That worst-case figure of 6.7 is just below the magnitude-7 threshold for satellite and orbiting-object brightness recommended by the International Astronomical Union.
It's also much better than the magnitude 3.7 scored by an uncoated SpaceX satellite tested by the researchers.
It's worth mentioning that SpaceX has also tested methods to reduce satellite brightness under the names DarkSat and VisorSat. Vantablack 310 proved comparable to or better than these as well.
"Under identical geometric and areal assumptions, the coated surface yields peak brightness values that are fainter than those reported for uncoated Starlink chassis, and comparable to or fainter than DarkSat and VisorSat variants," write the researchers in their published paper.
In addition, the team used an electron microscope to see how the ultra-black coating affected the treated satellite.
They found it created "coral-like features with cavity-like depressions", evidence of the physical properties that are doing the light trapping.
Vantablack 310 is a relatively new version of the original material, designed to be easier to apply and harder-wearing – though, as the researchers point out, all of this still needs to be put to the test in space.
"We emphasize that this study addresses optical performance only," write the researchers.
"Spacecraft-level thermal behavior, environmental durability, and system integration require dedicated thermal-vacuum testing and in-orbit validation and are therefore beyond the scope of this work."
Further experiments are already in the pipeline, and Vantablack 310 is set to be used on an upcoming CubeSat mission called Jovian-1. This will allow researchers to take real-world brightness measurements from the ground while the satellite is in orbit.
If we're going to be increasingly reliant on these LEO satellites for communication systems (and maybe even AI data centers), it shouldn't come at the cost of being able to get a full view of the night sky.
These initial tests show that Vantablack 310 can help – even if we'd still need a different solution for the space debris problem.
"Space is becoming increasingly crowded, creating challenges not only for astronomers but for everyone who values an unspoiled night sky," says astrophysicist Noelia Noël from the University of Surrey.
"What is encouraging about this research is that it moves us beyond simply identifying the problem and towards developing practical, evidence-based solutions."
The birth of modern Man
https://chuckincardinal.blogspot.com/










































